Village chickens are a pathway to alleviating poverty in resource-poor communities. Improvements to the informal poultry value chain, such as access to the market, commercialization, training and land, would assist in improving food security.
Introduction
There have been growing global challenges around poverty, hunger, malnutrition, and food security in developing countries, especially in rural areas. The Food and Agricultural Organisation has expressed concern about food availability crises, and it is expected that the impact on vulnerable groups will be worsen. We suggest that increasing the availability of animal protein through local production is important to boost food availability. For example, chickens are the key entry point for addressing malnutrition, food security, and poverty in resource-poor communities.[i] They have the potential to provide high-quality and safe agricultural products such as eggs and meat for consumption. In developing countries, approximately 475 million farmers keep village chickens, and the production depends on less than two hectares of land. Farmers in resource-poor communities already rely heavily on chickens for survival. Chickens’ ability to produce meat and eggs with minimal or no management inputs presents an opportunity to improve the informal market to feed a growing population and even to participate in the international market to gain foreign exchange.
Village chickens are mostly reared by rural women who face a number of socio-economic challenges. The chickens roam around scavenging for feed resources and can adapt to harsh conditions, thus keeping inputs to a minimum. Their ability to adapt to harsh conditions is potentially also an advantage as rural areas are affected by climate change and possible food shortages. The landless and those without cattle, sheep, or goats place a high socioeconomic value on chickens, which are a shared resource among the various gender groups in rural areas. Village hens should therefore be given priority in food security programs. [ii] The food and agricultural industries are greatly impacted by unforeseen difficulties like pandemics and natural disasters. One example is COVID-19, a pandemic disease that spread across the globe in 2020 and made food insecurity worse, particularly for vulnerable groups.
The FAO indicated that various food-production systems and agricultural practices were required for the 2023 implementation plan to satisfy human needs for the present and the future. The Sustainable Development Goal Policy 2030 plan, mainly number 2 (Zero Hunger), requires an urgent and concerted plan for food security and sustainable agriculture, especially in developing countries.[iii] Developing strategies to achieve Sustainable Development Goals that address food security and rural developments, including underutilized products and their gaps for sustainable agriculture, is critical.[iv] Village chickens not only play a crucial role economically, socially, and nutritionally; they can also empower women to support their livelihoods in the household.
Numerous experts and policy officials globally recognize the profitability of village chicken production and its potential to address poverty and malnutrition.[v] They are also more environmentally sustainable than extensive commercial operations because they utilize local resources, require less infrastructure, have a lower carbon footprint, and are more resilient to extreme weather events.[vi] The informal market in village chickens can achieve several of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, such as 1-No Poverty, 2-Zero Hunger, 3-Good Health and Well-Being, 4-Gender Equality, and 10-Reduce Inequality.[vii] Specifically, this informal market can contribute significantly to meeting goals 1 (No Poverty) and 2 (Zero Hunger) particularly for vulnerable groups, if the correct measures are taken.[viii]
The informal value chain of village chickens
The informal village chicken-value chain begins with household producers (farmers) who sell village poultry products to retailers (vendors) who are considered consumers, who then trade them in various places such as Central Business Districts. This niche is informal or traditional, with no regulations or support for various stakeholders. It is important to improve the informal value chain of village chickens by addressing both the challenges and opportunities in the market, with a view to determine what interventions are necessary. Village chickens do not qualify to participate in the mainstream, where they can compete with commercial chickens such as broilers and layers. This is due to their poor performance and low inputs, which result in low outputs.
Improving the informal value chain in economically disadvantaged communities is essential for leveraging village chickens as an underutilized resource to mitigate food insecurity. This will allow policymakers to formulate policies centred on the use of village chickens as a protein source, especially for vulnerable groups. Importantly, government needs to improve the availability and accessibility of land and funding, thereby creating job opportunities.
Village chicken producers and vendors in the informal value chain
Table 1 below provides detailed information about village chicken producers who are regarded as suppliers for vendors. Over 52% of the farmers are females, aged from 20 to 70, with farming experience ranging from less than five to more than 30 years. They farm these chickens for consumption, trade, and cultural purposes. Their main sources of income range from vending to government grants and pensions. Compared with commercial chickens, farmers prefer village chickens over broiler chickens. The reasons are mainly health benefits, long shelf life, taste, low labour, quality meat, availability, and high meat yield. Farmers depend on indigenous knowledge to farm the chickens; there is no available chicken production training. But 90% of them are interested in training with the intention of maximizing production for profit.
Table 1: The demographics of village chicken producers participating in the informal value chain
|
Demographic characteristics |
Ntembeni % |
Sweetwaters % |
KwaShange % |
P-value |
|
Gender of the owner of the chickens |
||||
|
Female |
64 |
54 |
52 |
* |
|
Male |
36 |
46 |
48 |
|
|
The age range of farmers |
||||
|
20 to 30 |
28 |
14 |
8 |
* |
|
30 to 40 |
34 |
24 |
20 |
|
|
40 to 50 |
14 |
32 |
12 |
|
|
50 to 60 |
14 |
14 |
16 |
|
|
60 to 70 |
10 |
16 |
44 |
|
|
Farming experience (years) |
||||
|
<5 |
38 |
26 |
26 |
* |
|
>5 |
28 |
18 |
22 |
|
|
>10 |
8 |
18 |
34 |
|
|
>20 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
>30 |
16 |
26 |
6 |
|
|
Major source of income |
||||
|
Vending |
6 |
6 |
8 |
NS |
|
Pension |
12 |
22 |
38 |
|
|
Formal work |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
|
Livestock |
10 |
12 |
8 |
|
|
Casual work |
26 |
32 |
24 |
|
|
Trading vegetables |
12 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
Government child support |
22 |
14 |
14 |
|
Village chickens from the rural areas are then sold to vendors located in the Central Business Districts. Most vendors (77%) are women, aged 20 to 70 years, with experience ranging from less than five to more than 30 years. Village chickens are mostly purchased by Africans and Asians, with different breeds in demand depending on the purpose of buying, such as consumption or cultural activities.
Table 2: The demographics of village chicken vendors participating in the informal value chain
|
Demographic characteristics |
Durban% |
Pietermaritzburg% |
P Value |
|
Gender of the trader |
|||
|
Female |
100 |
77 |
* |
|
Male |
0 |
23 |
|
|
Age of the trader (years) |
|||
|
20 to 30 |
16 |
0 |
NS |
|
30 to 40 |
21 |
15 |
|
|
40 to 50 |
21 |
62 |
|
|
50 to 60 |
26 |
15 |
|
|
60 to 70 |
16 |
8 |
|
|
Duration of trading (years) |
|||
|
Less than 5 |
21 |
13 |
* |
|
More than 5 |
5 |
41 |
|
|
More than 10 |
21 |
28 |
|
|
More than 20 |
21 |
15 |
|
|
More than 30 |
32 |
3 |
|
|
Major source of income |
|||
|
Vending other commodities |
47 |
54 |
NS |
|
Pensioner |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Vegetables |
0 |
8 |
|
|
Chickens |
53 |
38 |
|
|
Purpose of selling |
|||
|
Income |
100 |
100 |
NS |
|
Barter exchange |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Leisure |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Training of village chicken vendors |
|||
|
Training attended Not attended training |
0 100 |
11 89 |
* |
|
Interest to attend No interest in attending |
85 15 |
95 5 |
* |
|
Access to extension officer |
8 |
5 |
|
|
No access to extension officer |
92 |
95 |
* |
Source: Tenza, Mhlongo (7)
Conclusion
The informal value chain of village chickens is dominated by women. Interventions that can enhance this informal market are better access to more formal markets and commercialization. This is an opportunity for women's empowerment through the provision of scientific knowledge, opportunities, information, support and recognition. There is a need to be strategic planning in increasing the quantity and quality of village chickens, which requires inputs such as feed, disease control, record keeping, housing and bio-security measures. Training in resource-poor communities, particularly scientific training, is essential if village farmers want to raise chickens for the purposes of profit rather than only subsistence.
References
[i] Mulugeta S, Goshu G, Esatu W. Growth performance of DZ-white and improved Horro chicken breeds under different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. 2020
[ii] DE POULETS SDPV, L'AVENIR QR. Village chicken production systems in developing countries: what does the future hold? Mortality.1(1.7):2.
[iii] Gil JDB, Reidsma P, Giller K, Todman L, Whitmore A, van Ittersum M. Sustainable development goal 2: Improved targets and indicators for agriculture and food security. Ambio. 2019;48(7):685-98.
[iv] Liu S. Towards a sustainable agriculture: Achievements and challenges of Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 2.4.1. Global Food Security. 2023;37:100694.
[v] Mseleku C, Chimonyo M, Slotow R, Mhlongo LC, Ngidi MS. Contribution of Village Chickens in Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems for Children along a Rural Urban Gradient: A Systematic Review. Foods. 2023;12(19):3553.
[vi] Wong J, de Bruyn J, Bagnol B, Grieve H, Li M, Pym R, et al. Small-scale poultry and food security in resource-poor settings: A review. Global Food Security. 2017;15:43-52.
[vii] Tenza T, Mhlongo LC, Ncobela CN, Rani Z. Village Chickens for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals 1 and 2 in Resource-Poor Communities: A Literature Review. Agriculture. 2024;14(8):1264.
[viii] Wilson WC, Slingerland M, Baijukya FP, van Zanten H, Oosting S, Giller KE. Integrating the soybean-maize-chicken value chains to attain nutritious diets in Tanzania. Food Security. 2021;13(6):1595-612.
Reads